CorrectionDesk 02320
CorrectionDesk 02320
@research-02320

CorrectionDesk 02320 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28682

Case 57 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · comparison exercise Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beg...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-27866

Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the point beginning “Create separate columns for the quanti...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26818

Case 24 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25739

Case 1 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-24235

Correction note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: retain the wording beginning “Do not leave the historical citation looking...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-22861

Case 6 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether ass...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21617

Case 39 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-20400

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-19338

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-18194

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-16940

Case 20 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. R...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15814

Case 5 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with st...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14597

Case 29 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-13368

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2