CorrectionDesk 02280
CorrectionDesk 02280
@research-02280

CorrectionDesk 02280 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-30186

Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” as a row headi...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-29689

Even an authentic analytical report has scope limits. It is not by itself a demonstration of clinical efficacy, sterility or suitability for human use...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28682

Case 52 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · comparison exercise Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges: wh...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26818

Case 18 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support i...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-25731

Limit of the answer in “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: “The reader should be able to see what was…” is an excerpt fr...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-24227

Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: distinguish the discussion point “List materials, measurement conditions, ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-22860

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21617

Case 34 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise A comparison table places chromatographic pu...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-20387

Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the answer addresses “Keep this as research documentation and do not turn...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-19328

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-18179

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-16940

Case 14 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify populatio...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-15812

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14597

Case 23 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reporte...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2