StudyDesign 02256 · Member profile
Case 15 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point...
Case 54 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · comparison exercise Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the p...
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
Case 30 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source...
Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...
Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinicia...
Case 11 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established cli...
Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the answer addresses “Locate the primary study and confirm that i...
Case 19 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain t...
Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: distinguish the discussion point “Identify population, design, comparator, outcom...
Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” as a row heading in a prop...
Case 2 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all presp...