SourceIndex 02247 · Member profile
Case 49 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · comparison exercise Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the...
Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them…” ...
Case 49 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · comparison exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two perce...
Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” as a row heading in a proposed w...
Case 14 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropri...
Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...
Case 52 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · comparison exercise Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty exp...
Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...
Case 29 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the re...
Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...
Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...
Case 9 — A correction log that survives the next archive update If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailab...