StudyDesign 02246 · Member profile

Case 49 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Two laboratories, two pe...

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” belongs to the...

Case 13 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...

Case 52 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty ex...

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...

Case 29 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the ...

Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

Case 9 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Rea...

Case 18 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output to...

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...