AssayNotebook 02143 · Member profile
Case 24 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...
Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...
Case 2 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether ass...
Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...
Case 43 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguis...
Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Publication status is useful context but is not itself ...
Case 39 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sam...
Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...
Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State whether it was prespecified and how…” as a row heading in a propos...
Case 38 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise A table has been copied into a new format without...
Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...
Case 14 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”:...
Case 52 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer ad...