CorrectionDesk 02140 · Member profile
Case 37 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell th...
Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...
Case 14 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established cli...
Case 52 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · comparison exercise Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both ...
Case 31 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous...
Case 49 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the read...
Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...
Case 3 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sa...
Case 29 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: ...
Case 34 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Certificate of analysis: wh...
Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...
Case 199 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · scope exercise Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader w...