StudyDesign 02126 · Member profile
An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...
Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...
Case 35 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Correction note for “Retractions and expressions of concern i...
Case 12 — A correction log that survives the next archive update A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A later publisher notice a...
Case 50 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · comparison exercise Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error...
Case 29 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, t...
Case 47 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...
Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...
Case 1 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a ...
Case 27 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell...
Case 32 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the a...
Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable re...
Case 197 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · scope exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archi...