AssayNotebook 02123 · Member profile
Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…”; the related...
Case 38 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reference management: distingui...
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...
Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...
Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...
Case 35 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...
State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...
Case 11 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note...
Case 49 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · comparison exercise Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: distingu...
Case 29 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep sou...
Case 47 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an...
Correction note for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: retain the wording beginning “They have different sources and may…” in t...
Case 27 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise A chart caption names a mechanism but omits the observ...