CitationNotes 02062
CitationNotes 02062
@research-02062

CitationNotes 02062 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-25682

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24225

Case 26 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Pub...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-22806

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21617

Case 2 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether as...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20359

Case 41 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the p...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19314

Case 20 — A correction log for an archive article Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Identif...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18141

Case 38 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-16912

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15754

Case 41 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Two laboratories, two perc...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-14580

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13339

Case 18 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point b...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11968

Case 23 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Limit of the answer in “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: “Describe the species,...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-10676

Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: “State whether it was prespecified and how…” is an excerpt from the di...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-09543

Case 188 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · reader check exercise A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive ent...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2