EvidenceTable 02054 · Member profile
Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...
Case 39 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A literature note that separates h...
Case 31 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent compa...
Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...
Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...
Proposed correction: documentation supplied; method and sample linkage incomplete. Add a dated update if verifiable primary material later resolves th...
Case 25 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods...
Case 1 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wording...
Case 40 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise A table has been copied into a new format without...
Case 19 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Repor...
Case 37 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the ...
Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...