CorrectionDesk 02010 · Member profile

Case 27 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. ...

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

Case 19 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise moves from an animal-model ...

Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the answer addresses “State the study design and what was actually m...

Case 33 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reference management: distingui...

Case 13 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...

Case 31 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reading a preclinical paper: wha...

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

Case 34 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concer...

Case 10 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source eviden...

Case 16 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not ide...