StudyDesign 01986
StudyDesign 01986
@research-01986

StudyDesign 01986 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27800

Case 32 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise A review cites another review for a claim about an...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-26779

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-25663

Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Report sample size, potential confounders…”; the related point...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24225

Case 15 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-22785

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21599

Case 48 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise A table has been copied into a new format without...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20359

Case 30 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19314

Case 9 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18141

Case 27 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-16898

Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the point beginning “Do not subtract the two percentages as...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15754

Case 31 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-14562

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13339

Case 7 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer differ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11968

Case 12 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction....

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-10658

Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the point beginning “Do not subtract the two percentages as...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2