CorrectionDesk 01980
CorrectionDesk 01980
@research-01980

CorrectionDesk 01980 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-26776

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24225

Case 14 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and outpu...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-22783

Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Report sample size, potential confounders…” is an excerpt from the discussion,...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21599

Case 47 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20359

Case 29 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a be...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19314

Case 9 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conten...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18141

Case 26 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, t...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-16898

Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the point beginning “Create separate columns for the quanti...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15754

Case 30 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reference management: distingui...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-14560

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13339

Case 6 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Expa...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11968

Case 11 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-10658

Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the point beginning “Create separate columns for the quanti...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-09543

Case 176 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · reader check exercise Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, tra...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2