StudyDesign 01916 · Member profile
Case 17 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask...
Case 23 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the pro...
Case 35 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise A review cites another review for a claim about an...
Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...
Case 5 — A correction log for an archive article Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Identify the original error and th...
Case 38 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise A result is described only as statistically significant. Wha...
Case 20 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method con...
Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...
Case 17 — A correction log for an archive article Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Identif...
Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...
Case 21 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established cli...
Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Separate the authors’ interpretation from the…” belongs to...
Case 2 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wording...