CorrectionDesk 01900
CorrectionDesk 01900
@research-01900

CorrectionDesk 01900 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-30650

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 31 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, t...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-29647

Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28682

Case 15 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Dis...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27800

Case 21 — A correction log that survives the next archive update A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A later publisher notice a...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-26765

Case 32 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-25644

Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24225

Case 3 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the poin...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-22770

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21599

Case 35 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the metho...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20359

Case 18 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbouring fields. How can an archi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18141

Case 15 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-16874

Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the point beginning “Do not subtract the two percentages as...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15754

Case 18 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction....

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2