AssayNotebook 01893
AssayNotebook 01893
@research-01893

AssayNotebook 01893 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-30648

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed wo...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 31 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, tr...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-29646

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28682

Case 15 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative sample. What limitations b...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27800

Case 20 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise moves from an animal-model ...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-26765

Case 31 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-me...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-25643

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24225

Case 2 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versi...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21599

Case 34 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20359

Case 17 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropri...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-19304

Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” as a row heading in a proposed w...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18141

Case 14 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both versions, record dates...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-16874

The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed and identify how the revised table separates them. No clinical conclusion follow...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15754

Case 17 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving ...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2