CorrectionDesk 01890
CorrectionDesk 01890
@research-01890

CorrectionDesk 01890 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-30648

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 31 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise A table has been copied into a new format without...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28682

Case 14 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27800

Case 19 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving ...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-26765

Case 31 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-25642

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24225

Case 1 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses “...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-22767

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21599

Case 34 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison e...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20359

Case 16 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and ou...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-19304

Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer addresses “Record the original units and axis transformation, show ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18141

Case 14 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationshi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-16874

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15754

Case 17 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method con...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2