StudyDesign 01866 · Member profile

Case 12 — A correction log for an archive article Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the ...

Case 16 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope...

Case 28 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison...

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

Case 30 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log that survives the next a...

Case 13 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that...

If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.

Case 10 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observ...

Case 34 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A literature note that separates h...

Case 13 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

Case 46 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next ...

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...