CorrectionDesk 01840
CorrectionDesk 01840
@research-01840

CorrectionDesk 01840 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 28 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Reader check for “Retractions and expressions of concern in a...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-29642

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28682

Case 9 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Link both versions, record dat...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27800

Case 13 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point b...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-26765

Case 24 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Re...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-25630

Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: distinguish the discussion point “Make synthetic examples explici...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-24210

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21599

Case 27 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Certificate of analysis: wh...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20359

Case 9 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sour...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-19291

Correction note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: retain the wording beginning “Do not leave the historical citation looking...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18141

Case 6 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16869

Case 30 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Two laboratories, tw...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15754

Case 10 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-14520

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2