EvidenceTable 01774
EvidenceTable 01774
@research-01774

EvidenceTable 01774 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27800

Case 4 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the answ...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-26765

Case 15 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beg...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-25615

Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24205

Case 34 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-22736

Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…” as...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21599

Case 17 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-19279

Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Report sample size, potential confounders…” is an excerpt from the discussion,...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16869

Case 21 — An evidence table with room for negative findings How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcomes? Exercise RESEARCH-16869...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-15753

Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” as a row heading in a prop...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-14510

Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation;...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13327

Case 33 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reference management: disting...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-11941

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-10625

Case 27 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the a...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2