AssayNotebook 01763 · Member profile

Case 24 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the e...

Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: retain the wording beginning “Keep the source citation, retrie...

Case 1 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving t...

Case 3 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versi...

Case 13 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wordin...

Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the answer addresses “Retain units, method, laboratory interval ...

Case 32 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the...

Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: “Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection c...

Case 16 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study con...

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

Case 19 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sou...