CorrectionDesk 01760 · Member profile
Case 3 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationship...
Case 13 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning...
Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: use “Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection cont...
Case 32 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the l...
Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: distinguish the discussion point “A forum comparison cannot diagn...
Case 15 — A correction log for an archive article Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Identif...
Case 19 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the e...
Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...
Case 31 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the ...
Case 32 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...
Case 25 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcome...