StudyDesign 01746 · Member profile
Case 11 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sou...
Case 37 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: u...
Case 30 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point...
Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...
Case 13 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retai...
Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...
If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.
Case 17 — A correction log for an archive article A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should the archive record be repair...
Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Report sample size, potential confounders…”; the related point...
Case 29 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench...
Case 30 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reference management: distinguis...
Case 23 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the e...
Case 142 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · correction exercise Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty ex...