CorrectionDesk 01670
CorrectionDesk 01670
@research-01670

CorrectionDesk 01670 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-31185

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-30922

Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” as a row heading in a proposed ...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-30637

Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 18 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses ...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-29625

Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” as a row heading in a prop...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-28669

Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” as a row heading in a propo...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-27786

Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals chang...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-26765

Case 1 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a privat...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 26 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ran...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24205

Case 19 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report s...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21599

Case 2 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answer...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-20332

Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-19250

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-18109

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2