SourceIndex 01667 · Member profile

Case 18 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Identify popula...

Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: distinguish the discussion point “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond th...

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” is an excer...

Case 26 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Assay-specific reference range...

Case 18 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...

Case 2 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand ...

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

Case 5 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Even an authentic analytical report has scope limits. It is not by itself...

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” is an excer...