EvidenceTable 01654
EvidenceTable 01654
@research-01654

EvidenceTable 01654 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-27783

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-26762

Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the answer addresses “Create separate columns for the quant...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 24 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reporte...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24205

Case 17 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? A value has been quoted without units, assay method or reference interval. ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-22710

Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: “Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid translating…” i...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-21598

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-19246

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16869

Case 3 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain th...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 53 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-14489

Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” is an excerpt fr...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13327

Case 16 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output to...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-11938

Case 17 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-10625

Case 9 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Proposed correction: documentation supplied; method and sample linkage in...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2