StudyDesign 01626
StudyDesign 01626
@research-01626

StudyDesign 01626 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 5 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 16 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not ide...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-29621

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-26757

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 20 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain th...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24205

Case 13 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A reagent dossier contains a summary purity percentage but not the metho...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-22705

Even an authentic analytical report has scope limits. It is not by itself a demonstration of clinical efficacy, sterility or suitability for human use...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-21595

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-20324

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 45 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise A result is described only as statistically significant. Wha...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-18095

Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…”; the relate...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 49 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “R...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2