EvidenceTable 01624
EvidenceTable 01624
@research-01624

EvidenceTable 01624 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-29621

Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-28657

Reader check for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: distinguish the discussion point “Separate document provenance...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-27778

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-26756

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 20 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropri...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24205

Case 12 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-22705

A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer different questions. Record the report’s own definition and units before comparing ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 44 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-18095

Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” is an excerpt from the disc...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-16865

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 49 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · comparison exercise Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the poi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-14483

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13327

Case 12 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original repor...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2