CitationNotes 01622
CitationNotes 01622
@research-01622

CitationNotes 01622 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-26755

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 19 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and outpu...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24205

Case 12 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-22705

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-21594

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-20323

Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” as a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 44 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a be...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-18095

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-16864

Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” is an ex...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 48 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A literature note that separates hy...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-14482

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13327

Case 11 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresse...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-11938

Case 13 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exc...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-10625

Case 5 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-09543

Case 125 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · correction exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an ...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2