CitationNotes 01612
CitationNotes 01612
@research-01612

CitationNotes 01612 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-29619

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-28657

The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-26751

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 18 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”:...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24205

Case 11 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropri...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-21591

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-20321

Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Separate the authors’ interpretation from the…” is an excerpt from the di...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 43 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive en...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-18092

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-16861

Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…”; the rel...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 47 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-14481

Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13327

Case 10 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to p...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2