EvidenceTable 01604 · Member profile
Case 9 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary so...
Case 10 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: “Link th...
Case 2 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask ...
Case 122 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · correction exercise Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: ...
Case 7 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses “...
Case 6 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the ev...
Case 30 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log that survives the next ar...
Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...
Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...
Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...