Notifications
Clear all
Reading the evidence
1,501
Posts
1501
Users
0
Reactions
242
Views
08/10/2020 11:12 am
Case 120 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · uncertainty exercise
Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: distinguish the discussion point “Describe the species, model and…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: uncertainty. Leave the unresolved part visible instead of supplying a result.
08/10/2020 11:21 am
Case 121 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · correction exercise
A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the evidence chain be checked?
Review focus: correction. Preserve the old wording if a later source changes the interpretation. Use the original answer fragment “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-09543/121: address this question within its stated limits.
08/10/2020 12:00 pm
Case 121 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · correction exercise
Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: correction. Preserve the old wording if a later source changes the interpretation.
08/10/2020 12:07 pm
Case 121 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · correction exercise
Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Preserve the old wording if a later source changes the interpretation.
08/10/2020 1:24 pm
Case 121 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · correction exercise
Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: correction. Preserve the old wording if a later source changes the interpretation.
08/10/2020 1:48 pm
Case 121 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · correction exercise
Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: retain the wording beginning “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Preserve the old wording if a later source changes the interpretation.
08/10/2020 1:48 pm
Case 121 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · correction exercise
Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the answer addresses “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…”; the related point is “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: correction. Preserve the old wording if a later source changes the interpretation.
08/10/2020 2:13 pm
Case 121 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · correction exercise
Reader check for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: distinguish the discussion point “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: correction. Preserve the old wording if a later source changes the interpretation.
08/10/2020 3:06 pm
Case 122 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · correction exercise
Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Such material can suggest questions but…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: correction. Preserve the old wording if a later source changes the interpretation.
08/10/2020 3:11 pm
Case 122 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · correction exercise
A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative sample. What limitations belong in the note?
Review focus: correction. Preserve the old wording if a later source changes the interpretation. Use the original answer fragment “Such material can suggest questions but…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-09543/122: address this question within its stated limits.
08/10/2020 3:51 pm
Case 122 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · correction exercise
Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Such material can suggest questions but…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Preserve the old wording if a later source changes the interpretation.
08/10/2020 4:35 pm
Case 122 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · correction exercise
Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Such material can suggest questions but…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: correction. Preserve the old wording if a later source changes the interpretation.
08/10/2020 5:12 pm
Case 122 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · correction exercise
Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording beginning “Such material can suggest questions but…” in the record. If later material changes it, add the date, the changed wording and the source for that change; do not invent a completed correction here. Preserve the old wording if a later source changes the interpretation.
08/10/2020 5:34 pm
Case 122 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · correction exercise
Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Such material can suggest questions but…”; the related point is “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: correction. Preserve the old wording if a later source changes the interpretation.
08/10/2020 6:02 pm
Case 123 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · correction exercise
How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcomes?
Review focus: correction. Preserve the old wording if a later source changes the interpretation. Use the original answer fragment “Separate the authors’ interpretation from the…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RESEARCH-09543/123: address this question within its stated limits.
Share: