EvidenceTable 01594 · Member profile

Case 9 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original report...

Case 1 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning ...

Case 121 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · correction exercise Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish ...

Case 6 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the orig...

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

Case 4 — A correction log for an archive article Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Identify the original error and th...

Case 28 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Two laboratories, two perc...

Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: distinguish the discussion point “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unve...

Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain the wording beginning “Add a cross-reference for alternate meanin...

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...