MethodsReader 01591
MethodsReader 01591
@research-01591

MethodsReader 01591 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-29616

Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming th...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-28656

Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: distinguish the discussion point “Expand it on first use and name the…” fro...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-26744

Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the wording beginning “Record the original units and axis transformat...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 15 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether as...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24205

Case 8 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised? E...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-22692

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” be...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-21589

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-20316

Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” as a row...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 40 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful d...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-18089

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-16855

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 44 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Two laboratories, tw...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 54 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · comparison exercise Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison e...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13327

Case 7 — A correction log for an archive article Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the c...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2