StudyDesign 01576 · Member profile
Case 13 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ov...
Case 5 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresses...
Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguish the discussion point “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” f...
List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...
Case 37 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log that survives the next a...
Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...
Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...
Case 42 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous ...
Case 52 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates ...
Case 5 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the poin...
Case 6 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and seconda...
Case 118 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · uncertainty exercise Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertaint...