ArchiveReader 01575
ArchiveReader 01575
@research-01575

ArchiveReader 01575 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-29616

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-28655

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-27767

Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as a row heading in a proposed...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-26741

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 13 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative sample. What limitations b...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24205

Case 5 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wording...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-22690

Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…”; the related...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-20310

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 37 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-18083

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-16854

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 42 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguou...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 52 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · comparison exercise Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothe...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13327

Case 5 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2