EvidenceTable 01564
EvidenceTable 01564
@research-01564

EvidenceTable 01564 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 13 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source refere...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-29613

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-27765

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 11 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Method note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: use “Describe the species, mo...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24205

Case 4 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ove...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-22688

Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer addresses “Do not compare apparent visual distances…”; the related ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-21585

Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” as a row heading in a prop...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-20308

The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source evidence and revised interpretation. Preserve that distinction in subse...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 36 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reading a preclinical paper: wha...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-18081

Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” as a row heading in a prop...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-16852

Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: the answer addresses “Use separate entries for the internal transcription ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 40 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 50 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · comparison exercise Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next arch...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2