CorrectionDesk 01560 · Member profile
Case 10 — A correction log for an archive article Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Identify the orig...
Case 3 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and seconda...
Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” belongs to the...
Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…” as...
Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...
Case 35 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two p...
Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…” as...
Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: the point beginning “Use separate entries for the internal transcription c...
Case 40 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise A table has been copied into a new format without...
Case 50 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · comparison exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next arch...
Case 3 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the r...
Case 4 — A correction log for an archive article Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the origin...
Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...