CorrectionDesk 01520
CorrectionDesk 01520
@research-01520

CorrectionDesk 01520 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 28
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-31198

Case 33 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Method note for “A literature note that separates hyp...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-31183

Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…” as a row heading in a...

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 48 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A literature note that separates h...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-30625

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 10 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A reagent dossier contains a summary purity percentage but not the metho...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-29607

Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” i...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-28650

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Do not infer a physiological trend before assessing…” belongs to t...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-27756

Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: distinguish the discussion point “Report effect size, confidence interval an...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-26730

Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguish the discussion point “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference inte...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 5 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and reta...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-24202

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-22677

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-20300

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 29 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the la...

3 years ago
Page 1 / 2