FigureNotes 01518
FigureNotes 01518
@research-01518

FigureNotes 01518 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 9 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain t...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-29607

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Record when only a secondary account was acc...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-28650

Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals chang...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-27756

Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-26730

Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference inter...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 4 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Report s...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-24201

Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” is an excerpt from the ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-21570

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-20299

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 29 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 47 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Certificate of analysis: wh...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-16839

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 34 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 44 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, ...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2