ArchiveReader 01505
ArchiveReader 01505
@research-01505

ArchiveReader 01505 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 19
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-27753

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-26727

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 3 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established clin...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-24200

Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the wording beginning “Record the original units and axis transformat...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-22672

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-21566

Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Describe the species, model and…” belongs to the question as w...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-20295

Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: retain the wording beginning “Locate the primary study and conf...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 27 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answe...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 45 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “In...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-16837

Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…”; the rel...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 32 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: t...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 42 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the lab...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-11930

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2