CorrectionDesk 01500
CorrectionDesk 01500
@research-01500

CorrectionDesk 01500 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 27
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-31183

Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: distinguish the discussion point “Report sample size, potential confounders…” from it...

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 47 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference range...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 8 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-29605

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-28646

Method note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: use “Describe the species, model and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record....

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-27751

Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-26726

Method note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: use “Describe the species, model and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record....

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25612

Case 2 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-22671

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-21565

Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” as a row heading in a propo...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-20295

Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the answer addresses “Record when only a secondary account was ac...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 27 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 44 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2