CorrectionDesk 01490 · Member profile
Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...
Case 8 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropria...
Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation;...
Method note for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: use “Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction…” as a r...
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” be...
Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...
Case 25 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample...
Case 43 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the ...
Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” as a row heading in a proposed ...
Case 30 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise A result is described only as statistically significant. Wha...