ArchiveReader 01485
ArchiveReader 01485
@research-01485

ArchiveReader 01485 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-27748

If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-26723

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-25610

Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the point beginning “Do not subtract the two percentages as...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-24196

Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-22665

Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note what…”...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-21564

Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” as a row...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-20293

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” belongs to the...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 24 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 42 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 29 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-met...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 39 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-13306

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-11929

Case 27 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Method note for “Reading a preclinical paper: what ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-10597

Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” is an excerpt from the d...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2