EvidenceTable 01484
EvidenceTable 01484
@research-01484

EvidenceTable 01484 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 7 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output t...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-29603

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-28646

Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: retain the wording beginning “Describe the species, model and…” in the record. If...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-27748

Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-26723

Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep this as research documentation and ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-25610

Reader check for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: distinguish the discussion point “Create separate columns fo...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-24196

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-22665

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measuremen...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-21564

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-20293

Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 24 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 42 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the lab...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-16832

Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…”...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 29 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2