EvidenceTable 01474
EvidenceTable 01474
@research-01474

EvidenceTable 01474 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-28645

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-27746

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-26723

Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with e...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-25610

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-22663

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-21562

Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguish the discussion point “Publication status is useful context but is not itself...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-20291

Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions wit...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 23 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Descri...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 40 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguis...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-16830

Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 27 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the metho...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 37 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reference management: distinguis...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-13303

Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-11929

Case 25 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Certificate of analysis: wh...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2