CorrectionDesk 01450
CorrectionDesk 01450
@research-01450

CorrectionDesk 01450 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-28641

Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…”; the re...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-27740

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-26717

Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the answer addresses “A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condi...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-25602

Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” is an excer...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-24192

Case 32 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: r...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-22654

Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: use “Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them…” as ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-21561

Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…”; the re...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-20286

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 19 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Link both ver...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 37 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reference management: dist...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-16825

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 24 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 34 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncer...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-13299

Summary draft for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: the answer addresses “The reader should be able to see what was…”;...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-11929

Case 22 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2