ArchiveReader 01425
ArchiveReader 01425
@research-01425

ArchiveReader 01425 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-27735

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Record when only a secondary account was acc...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-26714

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-25600

Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording beginning “Such material can suggest questions but…” in the r...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-24192

Case 29 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-22648

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-20280

Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming th...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 16 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report s...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 33 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-me...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16822

Case 27 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguou...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 20 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 30 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-13296

Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: distinguish the discussion point “Add a cross-reference for alternate meani...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-11929

Case 18 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-10581

Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” as a row heading ...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2