CorrectionDesk 01420
CorrectionDesk 01420
@research-01420

CorrectionDesk 01420 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 5 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point be...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-29596

Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-28636

Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: the point beginning “Use separate entries for the internal transcription c...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-27735

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-25600

Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable re...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-24192

Case 28 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Method note for “Reading a preclinical paper: what ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-22646

Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Describe the species, model and…” belongs to the question as w...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-21555

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-20280

Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain the wording beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” in t...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 15 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 33 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16822

Case 27 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbourin...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 20 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conte...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 30 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2